Obama and Alien Secret Service?!

There has been a long tradition of belief in conspiracy circles of the presence of aliens here in Earth, and those aliens being complicit in World, and specifically American politics. A recent video has surfaced on You Tube of a supposed “Reptilian” serving on Barak Obama’s Secret Service Detail.

This sort of conspiracy theory loves to point out discrepancies as evidence of their keen observation, yet they always seem to somehow fail to find the same discrepancies in their own stories. Lets start with the “…strange behavior and creepy movement…” Okay, the subject is shifting from foot to foot and it strikes me as a bit odd he should call attention to himself in this manner. But I cannot say my first conclusion from this fact would be “strong evidence of a shape-shifting alien humanoid” so much as maybe a guy who needs to take a pee and cannot leave his post just now. Then as you watch the video they point him out from a different camera angle, the “creepy movements” have stopped, and they now ask you to disregard the fact that the image is distorted due to zoom and enlargement and take them at their word that those elements hove no bearing on the strange appearance of the subject.

A little looking turned up this photo of Obama’s Secret Service detail

AP photo by Scott Applewhite Scientist X

Of course showing the reptilian shape shifter while his cloaking device is working properly. But aside from having a reliable holographic humanoid projection device, I wonder what else you need to become a Secret Service agent?

According to Chron.Com

What Do I Have to Do to Become a Secret Service Agent?
by Scott Thompson, Demand Media

Getting a job with the U.S. Secret Service is far from easy, as the selection process is extremely competitive. Candidates must have either a college degree or a combination of college and law enforcement work experience, with a background in criminal investigation. They must also be in good shape and be able to pass a criminal background check.

Minimum Requirements
The first step to becoming a Secret Service agent is to excel in school and avoid getting into any trouble with the law. Because so many people want to become Secret Service agents and because of the sensitive nature of the work, any criminal activity on your record disqualifies you as an applicant. To apply for the Secret Service, you must be an American citizen between 21 and 37 years old, with uncorrected eyesight no worse than 20/60. If your eyesight is not 20/20 uncorrected, it must be correctable to 20/20. You must also possess a current driver’s license.

Other Requirements
All applicants for the Secret Service must pass the Treasury Enforcement Agent Examination, as well as other tests. Preference is given to applicants with an educational background in criminal justice or pre-law, but this is not an official requirement. All applicants must also pass a physical fitness test, a number of interviews and an investigation. If there is anything in your life history that would prevent you from receiving a top-secret-level security clearance, you will not be hired as a Secret Service agent. Secret Service positions are so competitive that you should probably start planning and preparing for your application from the beginning of your college career, if you want to be a strong candidate.

Well, I only hope the guy from this video is getting good laugh as the believers out there go on convincing themselves he is an shape-shifting reptilian humanoid alien.

________________________________________________________________________________

Comments | | Read More...

North Korea Ready For War

The US South Korean military exercises will continue until the end of this month, and the North Korean threats to do something terrible if they do not stop grow more hysterical by the day.

World View with Gwynne Dyer

Last week the Great Successor, Kim Jong-un, was shown signing a decree that ordered North Korea’s long-range missile forces to be ready to launch against the United States, while senior military officers looked on approvingly.

On the wall behind Kim was a map, helpfully labelled “US Mainland Strike Plan”, that showed the missile trajectories from North Korea to Hawaii, Los Angeles, Washington DC, and Austin, Texas. (Why Austin? Doesn’t he like indie rock?) It was a scene straight out of the villain’s lair in an early James Bond movie, except that they’d forgotten to set it in a cave.

These threats are so palpably empty that the instinct of both the Pentagon and the US State Department is just to ignore them. North Korea has no operational missile that can reach even western Alaska, no miniaturised nuclear warhead to put on such a missile, and no long-range targeting capability.

But the politics of the situation demands that the US government respond seriously to every threat, however foolish.

So next year the US government will spend another billion dollars or so to place 14 more anti-ballistic missile sites in Alaska,
presumably to protect the Alaskan west coast and the Aleutian Islands from a North Korean nuclear strike.

And on March 29, it sent two B-2 bombers all the way from Missouri non-stop to drop bombs on some uninhabited islands near North Korea, just to remind Pyongyang that it can. It’s all still just a charade, a spring display of military capacities by two rival armed forces that could as well be rutting deer.

The US would not even play this game if the logic of both international and domestic politics did not oblige it to respond to the increasingly rabid North Korean threats. But it is playing nevertheless, and the risk of miscalculation is quite serious.

Anybody who tells you he knows what is going on inside the North Korean regime is a liar, but there are a few safe assumptions. Real decision-making power on war and peace almost certainly lies with the senior ranks of the North Korean army, not with young Kim or the Communist Party.

It’s also clear that Kim, new to power and insecure, feels the need to look tough, just as his father did when he inherited the leadership from Kim’s grandfather.

And nobody in the North Korean regime knows how things work in the rest of the world. They may even be genuinely afraid that the US—South Korean military exercises, although they have been held annually for decades, are this time only a cover for a plan to attack North Korea.

After all, the regime’s founder, Kim Il-sung, concentrated his forces under cover of military exercises in just that way when he invaded South Korea in 1950.

The North Korean military doubtless understand that they must not get into a nuclear war with the US, but they may believe that their dozen or so nuclear weapons make it safe for them to use conventional force without facing American nuclear retaliation. And they do have rather a lot of conventional military force at their disposal.

Kim Jong-un’s threats are being exposed as bluffs almost daily— the US—South Korean military exercises go on as though he had said nothing— and he may ultimately feel obliged to do something to restore his credibility.

It would probably be just a limited local attack somewhere, but in the current atmosphere, with both Seoul and Washington determined not to submit to psychological blackmail, that could escalate rapidly to full-scale conventional war.

It would be a major war, for although North Korea’s weapons are mostly last-generation, that is not such a big handicap in ground warfare as it is in the air or at sea. North Korean troops are well-trained, and there are over a million of them. Moreover, South Korea is compelled to defend well forward because holding on to Seoul, only 50 kilometres from the frontier, is a political imperative. That makes it quite vulnerable to breakthroughs.

The North Koreans would attack south in a three-pronged thrust, accompanied by special forces operations deep in South Korean territory, just as they did in 1950. The geography gives them few alternatives.

US—South Korean strategy would also echo 1950-51: contain the North Korean attack as close to the border as possible, and then counter-attack up the west coast on an axis heading north through Kaesong to Pyongyang. That would once again be accompanied by a big amphibious landing well behind the North Korean front, this time probably at Wonsan on North Korea’s east coast.

Even if the North Korean air force were effectively destroyed in the first couple of days, as it probably would be, this would be a highly mobile, hard-fought land war in densely populated territory involving high casualties and massive destruction. The world has not seen such a war for more than 50 years now.

SCIENTIST X

Comments | | Read More...

Barack Obama Asked About ALIENS AND UFOs | BREAKING NEWS

Grant Cameron will appear on radio station KKNW 1150 Seattle on Monday March 26^th from 9:00 – 10:00 AM Eastern to discuss UFOs. Part of the discussion will center on the recent mention of the Roswell UFO crash by President Barack Obama in a recent trip to New Mexico. The statement made by Obama is more significant than many researchers might think.

During a March 21st trip to Roswell, New Mexico President Obama came out with the following opening remarks to his speech.

We had landed in Roswell. I announced to people when I landed that I had come in peace. (Laughter) Let me tell you – there are more nine and ten year old boys around the country when I meet them – they ask me, “Have you been to Roswell and is it true what they say? And I tell them, ‘If I told you I would have to kill you.’ So their eyes get all big…so…we’re going to keep our secrets here.

Did Obama let out the secret that an alien presence is being covered up? If so, t-his would be a complete reversal of an official statement  "Searching for ET- But No Evidence Yet" put out by the office of his science director last November that there is “no evidence” for ET visitation? What does it mean when the President goes to New Mexico and says “we are going to keep our secrets here?” Did he say too much about what has been rumored to be the most highly classified secret in the United States government? Did he fumble the ball in the biggest and most important game the United States Givernment has ever played?

Is it true what they say?

According to President Obama he often gets a particular question about the 1947 UFO crash in Roswell, New Mexico - “is it true what they say?”The little boys who usually ask the question want the President is to tell them the truth about whether aliens have crashed on earth. They think the President knows, so they ask the President if he can tell them the truth.

On March 21 President Obama gave the boys an answer while on a trip to the place where the aliens were rumored to have crashed 65 years ago. He gave the answer within a joke. Like many in America they are suspicious of the Roswell story put out by the Air Force and others.

Although the Obama Roswell comment might seem like no more than a small joke to open a speech on rising gas prices in the United States the following key points should be considered. When these points are all taken into consideration what Obama said takes on a much more significant meaning. A real close look at what Obama said actually shows that the President might have gone too far with the joke, and he may actually have confirmed that the United States government that he heads is covering up an ET presence.

Here’s exactly what President Obama said to the New Mexico audience who had gathered to hear him speak.,

We had landed in Roswell. I announced to people when I landed that I had come in peace. (Laughter) Let me tell you – there are more nine and ten year old boys around the country when I meet them – they ask me, “Have you been to Roswell and is it true what they say? And I tell them, ‘If I told you I would have to kill you.’ So their eyes get all big…so…we’re going to keep our secrets here.

Here’s a careful analysis of what it might mean, and the context in which it was said.

• Roswell is a key place in election years. Although New Mexico only has 5 electoral votes it is considered a swing state and most campaigns visit it near the end of a presidential election. Moreover, everyone (except Palin and Cheney) seems to have a joke in their speech about UFOs for the Roswell crowds. This started as early as 1982 when Ronald Reagan visited the old Roswell Air Field campaigning for Apollo 17 astronaut Harrison Schmitt late in the midterm campaign.

Cheney visited in the dying days of the 2000 election to be greeted by signs ‘Space Aliens Love Cheney.’" In the dying days of the 2002 midterm election Cheney showed up again in Roswell and this time made a speech in Hanger 32 just yards away from the infamous Hanger 84 at Roswell Air Field where the alien bodies were rumored to have been kept.

Just two days before the 2004 election, and the day before he made a campaign trip to Roswell for John Kerry, 4-star General Clark replied to a question of whether or not he had been briefed on the UFO subject stated, “I heard a bit. In fact, I'm going to be in Roswell, New Mexico tonight. There arethings going on. But we will have to work out our own mathematics.”

Lastly, the night before the 2008 election Republican candidate John McCain appeared for a campaign stop in Roswell, and declared that he had received the alien invasion endorsement from P’Lod, an alien that appeared every four years in the Weekly World News to predict the winner of the presidential race.

It was in light of this New Mexico political history that Obama showed up in New Mexico to talk about oil, and crack his version of the Roswell UFO joke.

• The opening “I come in peace” was a preplanned part of the reading copy repaired for Obama. Its appearance in the speech is important because it took some research on someone’s part to know they would set up a joke by paraphrasing the 1951 UFO movie, The Day the Earth Stood Still, in which the enlightened alien, Klaatu, tells the people of Earth: “We have come to visit you in peace and with good will.” Even I did not realize the significance of the line until Robbie Graham, the UFO movie expert from the U.K., pointed it out in an article. This would have been the work of the speech writing team but it would have to be approved by Obama and many other White House staffers.

• The Roswell Joke was also written into the speech. This is important to consider because it shows that on some level, no matter how circumstantial the discussion, the Roswell UFO crash was discussed by the President and his staff. This would mean one of two things. The President got a briefing on the subject of Roswell and there is secrecy and there is constitutionally backed presidential control over the Roswell evidence. If there was no briefing the mention of the Roswell crash in the speech at least means that the White House is aware that the Roswell UFO subject is one that requires a carefully orchestrated reply to deal with all the 9 and 10 year old kids who will pop the question from time to time.

It also goes again some recent discussion inside the UFO community that the government doesn’t care about the issue, or that they are much too busy cleaning up George Bush’s mess to give UFOs any thought.

It appears that when young boys ask “is what they say is true” (ie. Was the Roswell crash an extraterrestrial event?) the Obama administration policy appears to be to deal with the public disbelief in the official government Roswell explanation by using humor.

This ‘laugh it off” approach is backed up by the fact that this is the third time Obama has used humor to deal with UFO type issues and the second time that he has used the exact line, “If I told you, I would have to kill you.”[1] It is also an approach that has allowed the media an easy out to not cover the UFO story seriously.

• One of the most important things about Obama’s Roswell joke is the fact that he even brought it up. It was not necessary. He could have used a less threatening joke such as the one that George Bush used during his Roswell visit when he said, "I understand you have reports this morning of an unfamiliar aircraft. Don't worry -- it was just me."

• The most important thing about the Roswell part of Obama’s speech is the final line – “we’re going to keep our secrets here”. If you listen very carefully to the line you will find compelling evidence that 1) It was not part of the speech. Obama ad libbed it. 2) It is not part of the joke. Obama is dead serious.

If this is true President Obama may have actually slipped in confirming some sort of Top Secret Special Access research or technology program on UFOs. Such high level programs are so secret that they must be denied. Even an acknowledgement of its Top Secret existence (as it appears Obama did) jeopardizes the program security.

In a speech to the CIA following the killing of Bin Laden President Obama stated that the government kept what they knew secret and that “this is a good thing.” There was a huge applause. This time like Jimmy Carter before him who leaked the fact that America was working on Stealth, Obama stating “we are going to keep our secrets” about the Roswell UFO crash may be bring huge gasps from the people in charge of the secrecy rather than applause.

Fortunately for the President, however, the media will sleep through this leak as they have in the past. The situation is best described by Debra Orin, the former New York Post Washington Bureau Chief who broke the story that Bill Clinton had asked his former Attorney General Webster Hubbell to investigate UFOs.

When Orin stood up to ask President Clinton’s press secretary if the story of being sent on a UFO cover-up search by the President was true, as Hubbell had spelled it out in his book “Friends in High Places” the White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry walked around the question.

Orin came back with a follow-up question – "Did he ask Hubbell to find out about those two issues?"

Again the McCurry walked around the question saying, "I have no idea and I'm not going to respond to specific things in books that are written."

Years later Orin was interviewed. She recalled what happened next.  She explained that she waited for another reporter to follow up with another question and “they all rolled over and played dead.” The White House correspondents, according to author Howard Kurtz, did not defend Orin as they would then "risk losing whatever little access they had."

That was it for the Hubbell story and this Obama Roswell story will probably face the same grim death, like a starving child in a third world country waiting for someone in the west to save them.

Someday this will change, but not today, and probably not tomorrow.

Written by Grant Cameron

Comments | | Read More...